Use cases

Context travels. Project boundaries remain.

These synthetic examples show how one canonical self supports different work without cloning a complete personal profile into every workspace.

Career lens

Prepare an interview from approved evidence.

A career workspace loads confirmed achievements, positioning, technical depth, and leadership stories. Company research and interviewer strategy remain project-owned.

  • Search canonical evidence and claim freshness
  • Exclude publishing-private and unrelated personal context
  • Keep compensation and recruiter notes local
  • Propose corrected metrics or reusable interview learning

Synthetic task

“Prepare for an enterprise architecture interview. Use approved leadership examples and identify weak evidence.”

Context received

Career, technical, leadership, and interview lenses—with source paths and restrictions.

Possible proposal

Corrected scope metric, linked to interview notes as evidence. Canonical self remains unchanged until approval.

Publishing lens

Publish from verified, public-safe context.

A publishing workspace keeps posts, calendar, platform rules, performance, media, and prompts local while drawing on approved reusable knowledge.

  • Retrieve approved stories and voice guidance
  • Verify claim evidence and public disclosure
  • Filter employer-confidential content
  • Propose—not impose—performance-derived learning

Synthetic task

“Draft a public post about regulated AI using my approved voice and public-safe stories.”

Context received

Publishing lens plus explicitly public-safe claims. Employer-confidential and career-private passages are withheld.

Possible proposal

Reusable vocabulary or a proven story—never an automatic conversion of engagement metrics into a personal belief.

Technical lens

Carry judgment into engineering work.

A technical project can use architecture preferences, decision principles, and known constraints while code, ADRs, incidents, and implementation artifacts stay with the project.

  • Find prior decisions with provenance
  • Use task relevance to prioritize context
  • Detect stale or contradictory copies
  • Propose durable technical preferences when evidence supports them

Synthetic task

“Review this platform decision against my architecture principles and previous decisions.”

Context received

Technical and leadership lenses plus project-local ADRs.

Possible proposal

New decision principle backed by accepted ADR evidence and explicit user review.

What stays where

Ownership is part of product behavior.

ContentOwner
Identity, preferences, durable facts, approved storiesCanonical self
Applications, research, interviews, compensation strategyCareer project
Posts, calendar, performance, media, platform rulesPublishing project
Code, ADRs, incidents, delivery artifactsTechnical project
Reusable project discoveryProposal to self; user decides

Link a project without copying self files.