Idea in motion

The truth is: nobody knows

The current evidence does not establish a universal answer to whether the technology is ready, whether companies are ready, or which AI maturity sequence works.

September 9, 2026Strategy and complexity · Enterprise AI · AI transformation · Organizational change · Decision intelligenceOpen the original LinkedIn post ↗

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐬: 𝐧𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐬.

More precisely, the current evidence does not establish a universal answer to whether the technology is ready, whether companies are ready, or which AI maturity sequence works across organizations.

That is not indecision. It is a position against false certainty—and against selling maturity theatre as knowledge.

The evidence gives us enough reason to reject simple answers. Recent studies find gains in some teams and tasks, slowdowns in others, and bottlenecks moving into review and validation as output grows. DORA describes AI as an amplifier of the system around it. Results vary by model, task, workflow, organization and time.

𝑴𝒚 𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘: the responsible response is neither to wait for certainty nor to copy a universal maturity model. It is to operate AI transformation as disciplined discovery while the technology and the organization co-evolve.

AI moves capability, risk, bottlenecks and organizational structure at the same time. The technology keeps expanding what can be delegated. The company must keep learning what it can absorb, where judgment and ownership should sit, and which controls still reduce real risk.

𝐒𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨 𝐰𝐞 𝐝𝐨?

  1. State the assumptions, intended value and important unknowns.
  2. Choose one bounded, real workflow—not a demonstration detached from the work.
  3. Measure end-to-end value, risk and the current constraint—not just generated output.
  4. Decide explicitly what to absorb, what to change and what to preserve.
  5. Repeat as the technology and the organization evolve.

Preservation is part of the work. New capability does not invalidate the domain judgment, customer relationships, professional identity, institutional memory and useful controls that brought the company this far. But preservation cannot become a polite name for defending structures that no longer serve the outcome.

This is a decisive operating stance: move with evidence, expose uncertainty, learn from real work, and remain willing to revise the company without discarding it.

#EnterpriseAI #AITransformation #OrganizationalChange

Back to all thinking