Testing the replacement premise before committing capital
Architecture showed that a planned platform replacement was unnecessary, and an upgrade delivered value sooner.
Situation
Sales teams were starting their day in the field with information missing. The business intelligence platform was no longer producing the reports they needed within the available processing window. The accepted explanation was that the platform was too old to handle growing data volumes, and a major replacement was planned.
Decision
The regional architecture function that Samuel built led the problem framing, the solution assessment, and the decision framework. It started from the operational objective, information ready at the start of the working day, and compared market options, vendors, and alternative technologies on fit and expected return.
Result
The constraint was platform maintenance rather than an inherent limit of the technology. The replacement was stopped in favour of an upgrade roadmap, which delivered business value within six months, earlier than a replacement could have, and directed the investment at the actual need.
Principle
Modernization can create value faster when architecture tests the replacement premise before capital is committed.
Weighing replace versus modernize?
Describe the decision in front of you, what has been tried, and what is at stake.